Make the message easier to follow
Post Readability & Accessibility Checker
Find the parts of your draft that need a closer look. Review sentence length, paragraph density and text patterns, then compare a revision without losing your original.
Same information. A clearer reading path.
IMPORTANT!!! Please complete the booking request with your item details before choosing an appointment so our team can prepare for your visit.
Tell us which item you will bring. Then choose an appointment. The details help our team prepare for your visit.
A writing review, not a grammar verdict or accessibility certificate.
Useful feedback starts with your actual text
Review the draft before it becomes a post
Choose your editing preferences. Every highlighted pattern is a point to inspect, not an instruction to delete it.
Your draft and preferences
Optional: use for known English prose with at least 100 eligible words and three sentences. This is not language detection.
Up to 20,000 text units per version. Your original and revision stay separate.
Original draft review
What changed between the two versions?
These are text differences, not a score of which version is better. Confirm that the revision still carries the facts and conditions.
| Measurement | Original | Revision | Change |
|---|
View textual additions and removals
Added text is underlined in green. Removed text is struck through in red. Neither is an automatic recommendation.
Inspect the text in context
No content upload, social login or autosave. PDF includes measurements and the first 12 findings per version, not the full text. CSV includes all findings; JSON keeps both drafts. PDF pages are rendered; use TXT for selectable text. Check media, native layout and assistive reading separately.
How the text review works
Measure visible patterns
Sentence and paragraph thresholds are your preferences. Word counts exclude recognized web addresses; they do not measure the quality of an idea.
Text structure, not a universal scoreKeep the editorial decision
Acronyms, technical terms and direction marks can be necessary. Each flag explains what was found so you can judge it in context.
Observation + human reviewCompare without overwriting
Keep the original while trying a revision. Review changed text and measurements, then save the version you actually approve.
Original and revision stay separateUse a review method, not a verdict
A useful review starts with a reader and a decision. A customer checking a delivery notice needs to know whether their order is affected. A buyer reading a service offer needs to understand the scope before making an enquiry. These tasks cannot be reduced to one quality number. Write down the question your post must answer, then use the checker to inspect how the text supports that answer.
The method has three parts: observe the text, consider each finding in context, and review your own changes. Counts describe features such as words and sentences. Flags identify a particular pattern or a place needing manual attention. Neither tells you whether a promise is true or an explanation is complete. A short sentence can still be vague, and a longer sentence can contain a necessary condition.
Treat every finding as a review prompt. An uppercase product code may be correct. A quoted passage may need its original wording. A technical term may be the clearest name for an expert audience. The useful response can be to keep the text and record why. Editing until every flag disappears is not the goal, especially when doing so would remove meaning or introduce an inaccurate substitute.
Accessibility also involves the experience around these words. This text-only tool cannot inspect image descriptions, contrast, font size, video timing, or how a native interface works with a screen reader. It does not generate alt text or certify a post. Use the review to prepare clearer text, then check the actual post and its media separately with the people and tools appropriate to that task.
Prepare the draft for the business situation
Choose text that you own or have permission to review. Remove private customer details that are unnecessary for the task. A service team can replace a real order number with an illustrative label while considering sentence structure. Browser processing does not decide whether information belongs in public. Keep the source of approved facts nearby so you can compare the wording with the actual arrangement, rather than relying on memory.
The platform selector labels the destination context: Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, Facebook, LinkedIn, Threads, X, Snapchat, or Reddit. Load example supplies one shared workshop draft and revision. The selector does not change the analysis rules or enforce an account action limit. Choose the destination, then consider the role of the text there. A video description can support navigation, while a short announcement may need its affected audience in the first line.
Keep the original as your reference and make changes in the optional revision. Both fields are editable by you. If you alter the original too, it is no longer the same baseline, so be deliberate about that choice. For a team review, agree which version contains the approved facts before comparing. Otherwise, an apparent improvement may simply reflect two different offers or two different sets of information.
For an appointment reminder, the crucial details may be the date, local time, location, and what the recipient must bring. For a training offer, they may be the intended audience, prerequisites, and what is included. Ask the person responsible for those details to confirm them. The checker will process an incorrect address as readily as a correct one; it does not perform factual checks or read your booking records.
Understand the counts and adjustable thresholds
Words, sentences, and visible character clusters are segmented with the browser feature Intl.Segmenter. The general word count uses wordlike segments containing a letter or number and excludes recognized HTTP web addresses. Sentence totals include only segments containing words. Paragraphs are separated by blank lines. These are stated counting rules, not an understanding of your argument. Abbreviations, unusual punctuation, and mixed scripts deserve a look when a boundary seems unexpected.
The default long-sentence threshold is 25 words. You can change it from 15 to 50. A sentence is flagged only when it exceeds the selected threshold: 25 words is not greater than a setting of 25. Use that preference to find sentences worth inspecting. Do not present it as a universal writing rule, an official social platform limit, or a point at which every reader suddenly loses understanding.
The dense-paragraph threshold starts at 80 words and can be set from 40 to 150. Again, the flag applies above the threshold, not at it. A blank line can separate two different ideas, but adding blank lines does not repair a missing explanation. Decide where the topic changes first. Then use paragraph breaks to make that structure visible, rather than breaking text at arbitrary intervals to reduce the finding count.
Each draft accepts up to 20,000 UTF-16 units. Those units are not always the same as visible characters: a joined emoji can use several underlying units. This is the editor capacity, not a recommended post length or a native platform allowance. For a separate length review, use the social media character counter. Return to the destination composer to check the final text in its real setting.
Work through a wholesale delivery notice
Consider a fictional food wholesaler updating shops on one delivery route. Its approved facts are a Thursday change, an east-route delay of one hour, and an exception for separately agreed delivery times. The warehouse departure also moves from 08:00 to 09:00. The writing task is to help affected shop staff plan their receiving work. It is not to make the notice as short as possible or imply that every route has changed.
The original reads: Our Thursday delivery route will leave the warehouse at 09:00 instead of 08:00, so shops on the east route should expect their usual order one hour later unless we have confirmed a separate delivery time.
At the default setting, this is a long sentence to review. It combines the operational cause, the customer effect, and the exception. The main editing question is whether those parts are easy to find.
A possible revision reads: Thursday deliveries on the east route will arrive one hour later than usual. The van will leave our warehouse at 09:00 instead of 08:00. A separately confirmed delivery time still applies.
The customer effect now comes first, and the exception remains explicit. This is an illustrative rewrite by a person, not an automatic tool output. The business must still confirm the timing before using either draft.
Compare what each version lets a reader conclude. Neither says that the west route is delayed. Neither cancels a separately confirmed time. If the team removed the final sentence to save space, the notice would lose a meaningful condition. If it replaced Thursday with tomorrow, a later reader might misunderstand the date. A useful final edit would add the approved calendar date when needed, without inventing one during the review.
Apply the review to your own words
Inspect one draft with a clear purpose
Bring a real notice, offer, or explanation. Review the findings, then compare a revision you have edited yourself.
Read each flag in its own context
Long-sentence and dense-paragraph flags point to length patterns. Uppercase tokens with at least four letters and repeated runs of exclamation or question marks are also review prompts. A heading such as IMPORTANT may compete with the actual instruction, while an established acronym may be necessary. The checker does not decide between them. Inspect the excerpt and location, then ask whether the emphasis helps the specific reader or simply adds noise.
Some findings identify explicit zero-width, bidirectional, or control characters that are hard to see. These deserve investigation, not blanket removal. Direction controls can have a legitimate role in mixed-direction writing. A zero-width joiner inside an emoji sequence is not treated as a generic hidden-character problem. Preserve the original while examining an unfamiliar character, especially in names, multilingual text, or symbols where changing one element can change the result.
Single-case hashtags receive a manual casing review. The tool does not infer which words a tag contains. A tag might be one word, an acronym, or a phrase with several possible divisions. Decide its intended reading yourself, then consider meaningful capitals if it contains multiple words. Do not insert spaces into a tag unless you intend to change its structure. The finding is not proof of an accessibility barrier.
Web links receive a manual context and destination check. The checker does not fetch a page, follow a redirect, or confirm that a resource is current. Read the surrounding wording and open the destination yourself when appropriate. A link introduced as delivery details should actually help with that task. The location and excerpt help you find the reference; they cannot establish that the destination delivers what your post promises.
Enable English estimates only for suitable samples
English reading estimates are optional and off by default. Enable them only when you know the sample is English. Eligibility requires at least 100 eligible English word tokens, at least three sentences, and at least 90 percent Latin-letter word tokens. That last check is not language detection. A sample in another language can use Latin letters, so meeting a numerical condition does not make an English formula appropriate for it.
The formula sample excludes URLs, hashtags, mentions, and numeric-only tokens. Its word total can therefore differ from the general text count. The results show the formula denominators separately: W for eligible words, S for sentences in the formula sample, and Y for estimated syllables. Check those inputs before interpreting a difference. A draft containing many tags or product references may have a much smaller formula sample than its overall length suggests.
Flesch Reading Ease uses 206.835 - 1.015(W/S) - 84.6(Y/W). Flesch-Kincaid Grade uses 0.39(W/S) + 11.8(Y/W) - 15.59. Reading Ease can fall outside zero to 100, and a grade estimate can be negative; the tool does not clamp those values. These equations describe relationships between sentence length and estimated syllables. Their numerical precision does not make them a precise measure of what a particular person understands.
English syllable estimates are approximate, particularly for names and specialist vocabulary. Do not pad a short notice to qualify or remove an essential term to move a result. The delivery example is deliberately too short for these estimates; its clarity can still be reviewed. An unavailable estimate is not a failed check. For longer material, use any change as one observation beside the actual explanation, audience needs, and retained facts.
Compare changes without assuming less is better
Compare the original and revision after making one purposeful set of edits. You might bring the affected audience forward, separate a condition, or define a term. Review counts, formula eligibility where relevant, and the visible text changes together. If you change both the wording and the business offer at once, it becomes harder to tell what the comparison means. Keep factual corrections clear in your review notes rather than disguising them as style changes.
The textual comparison uses the established jsdiff library with bounded work. It shows additions and removals, not whether the new meaning is better. A removed not can reverse an instruction. An added usually can weaken a promise. Neither change is evaluated semantically by the tool. Read around each changed passage and check its connection to nearby conditions, rather than approving a revision because the highlighted areas look small.
A course provider might replace Materials are included
with The fee includes printed worksheets; bring your own laptop.
That revision is longer but may answer an important practical question. An equipment supplier may need to keep a precise model name that raises a syllable estimate. In both cases, completeness can matter more than a smaller count. No result here establishes better engagement, better search performance, or a stronger commercial outcome.
Ask someone unfamiliar with the source to explain the intended next step in their own words. For the delivery notice, they should identify the affected route, the change, and the exception. For a service offer, they should identify what is included and what remains separate. A mismatch gives you a concrete editing task. This small reader check adds information that mechanical counts cannot provide, without pretending that one reviewer represents every possible audience.
Keep a useful record and finish in the real setting
Copy the report when you need a quick review record. Download the original or revision as TXT for a text handoff, or the full findings as CSV for a detailed list. The PDF is a review summary: it includes metric comparison and the first 12 findings for each selected draft, with excerpts and coverage information. It is not a full transcript of every finding or a substitute for the complete source text.
Save a JSON project explicitly if you need to continue later. There is no autosave. Project import accepts files up to 1 MB and validates a project before replacing the current work. Treat saved files, exported reports, and clipboard copies according to the sensitivity of their text. Keeping analysis in your browser does not control where you later paste a report or who can access a downloaded file on a shared device.
Private edits do not create content requests to a server. The checker does not look up social accounts, publish posts, or connect a draft to Skye. Human editing and account actions remain separate work. Before publication, inspect the native composer, line wrapping, links, media, and relevant assistive technology behavior. For timed spoken content, the subtitle editor addresses a different preparation task; text readability alone cannot check playback or caption timing.
Finish with an approved draft and a clear owner for the next step. A reviewer can confirm wording while an operations colleague confirms delivery facts. A publisher then checks the actual destination. Explore the free tools directory for other preparation tasks when they fit your work. SMTasker can be considered separately for supported account routines, but this review does not import text into those routines or confirm that any account action has happened.
Give each kind of post a useful reading path
Platform and editing guides
Instagram Captions
Help readers understand what your Instagram post offers, which details matter, and what to do next. Review the first meaningful line, keep conditions close to the promise, and connect the words to the actual photos.
Read the readability guideTikTok Captions
A useful TikTok caption explains what the clip demonstrates and which details viewers need before trying it. Give the post caption a clear job, keep the spoken instructions accurate, and review on-screen text separately.
Read the readability guideYouTube Descriptions
Treat your YouTube description as a guide to the lesson, not a loose pile of timestamps and links. Explain who the video helps, label the parts viewers may revisit, and make resource versions and conditions easy to distinguish.
Read the readability guideFacebook Post Readability
A local announcement works when someone can tell whether it affects them and what to do next. Use the free Post Readability and Accessibility Checker to review your own draft, then check its meaning against the real service details. This guide follows a fictional repair workshop moving a free clothing repair session to a different venue. The task is not to make the post as short as possible. It is to make the change clear without losing the conditions that help people plan a visit.
Read the readability guideLinkedIn Post Readability
A professional post should make your thinking easier to follow, not make the work sound simpler than it was. Use the free Post Readability and Accessibility Checker to review the draft you wrote and compare your own revision. This guide follows a fictional distributor reporting on a small order-intake pilot. Its readers need to understand the operational change, the measured result, and the limits of the evidence. The useful outcome is a credible project memo, not a collection of impressive terms or a perfect-looking score.
Read the readability guideThreads Post Readability
A short question can still be difficult to answer when readers do not know what this, that, or better refers to. Use the free Post Readability and Accessibility Checker to inspect your own wording, then review the conversation’s meaning yourself. This guide follows a fictional maker developing a plywood recipe stand. The maker wants to learn how people adjust a book while cooking, not collect praise for a finished product. Clear context helps readers contribute experience instead of guessing which part of a photo the question concerns.
Read the readability guideX Post Readability
A short X post can still leave readers guessing. They may know something is wrong without knowing which service is affected, whether the information is confirmed, or what to do next. Readability means giving those details a clear order. This guide focuses on one self-contained post, using a fictional service incident to show how to cut filler while keeping the facts that make an update useful.
Read the readability guideSnapchat Text Readability
Snapchat text has two jobs: make sense as wording and remain readable while the frame is visible. A short sentence can do the first job and still disappear over a moving background. Start with a small script, then review the actual sequence on a phone. This guide uses a fictional drawing prompt to connect plain-language editing with the separate visual and playback checks that a text-only tool cannot perform.
Read the readability guideReddit Post Readability
A useful Reddit help post gives people something specific to answer. It names the problem, explains what happened, and shows which details are known rather than guessed. You do not need to turn a personal question into a formal report. You do need to remove the uncertainty that makes a reader ask several basic questions before offering help. This guide follows a fictional note-export problem from a vague complaint to a clear request and a useful update.
Read the readability guidePlain-Language Editing Checklist
Plain-language editing makes information easier to use without changing the arrangement it describes. Start with the facts and conditions that must survive. Then improve the order, words, and sentence structure. A shorter draft is useful only when it still gives readers the information they need to make the right decision.
Read the readability guideUnicode & Accessible Social Text
Unicode makes many writing systems, accents, symbols, and emoji possible in the same text. It is not a problem to remove. The editing task is to distinguish meaningful text from decoration or accidental characters, while preserving names, language, and joined emoji. This guide explains that review without promising one result for every reader or device.
Read the readability guideQuestions before you revise your text
Is this an accessibility score or a full accessibility audit?
No. It reviews features of your supplied plain text and offers manual review prompts. It cannot assess the complete post, media, native interface, or a particular screen reader experience. Fewer flags do not certify accessibility, and a flagged passage is not automatically a barrier.
Does the checker fix grammar or rewrite my post?
No. You edit both drafts yourself. The tool does not act as a grammar AI, detect passive voice, verify facts, or generate replacement copy. Counts, excerpts, and text differences help you inspect your work without making the editorial decision for you.
Why is there no English reading estimate for my caption?
The optional estimates are off by default and need a suitable English sample: at least 100 eligible words, three sentences, and 90 percent Latin-letter word tokens. URLs, tags, mentions, and numeric-only tokens are excluded. A short caption can still use the other checks without qualifying.
Does choosing a platform apply its posting limits?
No. The selector labels the destination context; Load example uses the same workshop drafts for every platform. Sentence and paragraph thresholds are your editing preferences, not platform rules. The 20,000 UTF-16-unit capacity applies to each editor field. Check destination-specific length and presentation separately before publishing.
Will the tool keep or publish my draft?
Text review runs in your browser without a social login or content upload. There is no autosave or automatic posting. Save a JSON project yourself to continue later, and handle any report, downloaded text, or clipboard copy with the care its contents require.
Plan the work after approval
Keep recurring account work organized
Explore SMTasker for supported account routines while keeping text approval and destination checks in your own workflow.